Best Employee Decision Using Multi Attribute Utility Theory Method
Abstract
Selection of the best employee is a form of appreciation that can be shown by the company for the achievements of its employees. This appreciation can motivate employees to be more enthusiastic in improving their performance at work. Appropriate evaluation and decision-making methods need to be taken so that the best employee selection process runs objectively, transparently, and in accordance with established standards. This study aimed to select the best employee candidates at PT Kerry Express Indonesia using the multi attribute utility theory (MAUT) method. The criteria for the selection process as follows: attendance (weight = 2), output obtained (weight = 3), discipline (weight = 3), and reporting (weight= 2). The employees in this study were 30 respondents from 150 populations. The assessment was carried out for three months from January to April 2022. The calculations were carried out using the Microsoft Access tool. The results of calculations using the MAUT method show that the highest rank among all candidates has a score of 7.75 while the lowest rank had a score of 3.25. It can be concluded that the MAUT method can be used to select the best employees at PT. Kerry Express Indonesia effectively and efficiently.
Downloads
References
N.A. Rudi Hermawan, Muhammad Tri Habibie, Danang Sutrisno, Arman Syah Putra, Decision Support System For The Best Employee Selection Recommendation Using Ahp (Analytic Hierarchy Process) Method, Int. J. Educ. Res. Soc. Sci. 2 (2021) 1218–1226. https://ijersc.org/index.php/go/article/view/187/173 (accessed July 20, 2022).
B.M. Amin, The Impact Of Performance Appraisal On Employees’ Productivity In Electrical Manufacturing Sector At Penang, Malaysia, Int. J. Supply Chain. Oper. Manag. Logist. 3 (2022) 11–22. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJSCOL.36002.
S. Rohman Cholil, Best employee selection in Central Java using the ELECTRE method Automatic detection nuchal translucency in fetal organ View project, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429322235-12.
R. Rahim, S. Supiyandi, A.P.U. Siahaan, T. Listyorini, A.P. Utomo, W.A. Triyanto, Y. Irawan, S. Aisyah, M. Khairani, S. Sundari, K. Khairunnisa, TOPSIS Method Application for Decision Support System in Internal Control for Selecting Best Employees, IOP Conf. Ser. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1028 (2018) 12052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012052.
D. Kurniawati, D. Kusumawati, M. Arifah, Developing a Decision Support System with Dynamic Criteria for The Best Employee Assessment, J. Int. Conf. Proc. 2 (2019) 60–68. https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v2i2.603.
D. Aldo, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( Maut ), Jursima. 7 (2019) 76. https://doi.org/10.47024/js.v7i2.180.
Tentang Kami - Kerry Express Indonesia, (n.d.). https://id.kerryexpress.com/tentang-kami/ (accessed May 19, 2022).
Falahah, Defining and prioritizing software requirement using gIBIS and AHP method, Univers. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 6 (2019) 32–44. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujeee.2019.061404.
D.F. Manotas, AHP – TOPSIS Methodology for Stock Portfolio Investments, (2022).
P. Angelia, R. Munadi, N.M. Adriansyah, Frequency recommendation for long term evolution network implementation using simple multi attribute rating technique, Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 25 (2022) 1563–1570. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v25.i3.pp1563-1570.
D.R. Nur, D. Rahman, Application Of Fuzzy Multi Ttributes Of Decision (Madm) In Supporting Decision To Determine Best Graduate 2 Where rij is the normalized performance rating of alternative Ai and attribute Cj; i, (2019) 5–10.
M.I. Nasution, A. Fadlil, S. Sunardi, Perbandingan Metode Smart dan Maut untuk Pemilihan Karyawan pada Merapi Online Corporation, J. Teknol. Inf. Dan Ilmu Komput. 8 (2021) 1205. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2021863583.
M. Velasquez, P. Hester, An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods, Int. J. Oper. Res. 10 (2013) 56–66.
E.H. Chan, H.C. Suen, C.K. Chan, MAUT-Based Dispute Resolution Selection Model Prototype for International Construction Projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 132 (2006) 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2006)132:5(444).
I. Fajarwati, N.S. Fitriasari, H. Siregar, Perbandingan Metode Weighted Product (WP), Weighted Sum Model (WSM) Dan Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Tenaga Kerja, J. Teor. Dan Apl. Ilmu Komput. 1 (2018) 25–32.
N. Hadinata, Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Penerima Kredit, J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. Dan Komputer). 7 (2018) 87–92. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.562.
R. Kariman, H. Priyanto, H. Sastypratiwi, Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada Aplikasi Pemilihan Staf Berprestasi Dinas Pangan Pertanian dan Perikanan Kota Pontianak, J. Sist. Dan Teknol. Inf. 8 (2020) 212. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v8i2.38234.
K. Neti, D. Sartika, The Implementation of Multi Attribute Utility Theory Method for Employee Performance Appraisal in The Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights ( Kemenkumham ) of Bengkulu Province Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory untuk Pen, (2021) 252–262.
F. El Khair, S. Defit, Y. Yuhandri, Sistem Keputusan dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory dalam Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai, J. Inf. Dan Teknol. 3 (2021) 215–220. https://doi.org/10.37034/jidt.v3i4.155.
D.S. Kusma Neti, Siswanto, The Implementation of Multi Attribute Utility Theory Method for Employee Performance Appraisal in The Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kemenkumham) of Bengkulu Province, KOMITEK. 1 (2021) 252–262. https://penerbitadm.com/index.php/KOMITEK/article/view/222/454 (accessed July 20, 2022).
Z.X. Jing, J.H. Shi, Z.Y. Luo, A. -, I. Taufik, C.N. Alam, Z. Mustofa, A. Rusdiana, W. Uriawan, Implementation of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method for selecting diplomats, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1098 (2021) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1098/3/032055.
E.H. Gede Surya Mahendra, Implementation of AHP-MAUT and AHP-Profile Matching Methods in OJT Student Placement DSS, J. Tek. Inform. C.I.T Medicom. 1 (2021) 13–23. https://www.medikom.iocspublisher.org/index.php/JTI/article/view/56/27 (accessed July 20, 2022).
A. Perdana Windarto Program Studi Sistem Informasi, S.A. Tunas Bangsa Pematangsiantar, Implementasi Metode Topsis Dan Saw Dalam Memberikan Reward Pelanggan, Kumpul. J. Ilmu Komput. 04 (2017).
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright in each article belongs to the author
- The author acknowledges that the RESTI Journal (System Engineering and Information Technology) is the first publisher to publish with a license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors can enter writing separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) journal ;